Global media Update tech Update & Automobile Life Style & Entertainment
The Bihar Public Service Commission (BPSC) has issued legal notices to two renowned teachers from Patna, Khan sir and Guru Rahman. According to the notice, both teachers have allegedly tarnished the commission’s reputation and misled candidates without providing any evidence to back their claims.
BPSC responded to allegations surrounding the normalization process in the 70th Combined Preliminary Examination. The commission labeled Guru Rahman’s statements on normalization as baseless and misleading. The notice accused Rahman of spreading rumors, which not only questioned the credibility of the commission but also weakened public trust in the examination process.
The commission highlighted in the notice that the teachers’ comments aimed to damage the reputation of BPSC and create confusion among aspirants. It clarified that the normalization process was conducted transparently and aligned with the advertised terms of the examination.
Responding to the legal notice, Guru Rahman defended his statements, claiming they were based on information provided during a meeting with the commission. He alleged that the chairman and secretary of BPSC are misleading the public. Rahman further pointed out that the commission had already mentioned in advertisements that examinations would be conducted with multiple question papers, which is still visible on their official website.
Rahman outrightly rejected the demand for an apology, stating, “There is no question of apologizing. Instead, the commission owes an apology to the candidates.”
The ongoing controversy has raised concerns among aspirants regarding the credibility of the examination process. While BPSC continues to stand by its methods and processes, the allegations from reputed educators like Khansir and Guru Rahman have fueled debates on transparency and fairness.
The notice explicitly states that if Khan sir and Guru Rahman fail to issue a public apology or provide evidence for their claims, they will face both civil and criminal proceedings. Such legal actions could include defamation charges, given the alleged impact of their statements on BPSC’s reputation.
BPSC reiterated its commitment to a fair and transparent examination process. The commission emphasized that normalization was applied to ensure fairness across different sets of question papers in the examination. Any doubts or misinformation regarding the process were deemed as deliberate attempts to undermine the commission’s credibility.
As the deadline for the legal notice approaches, all eyes are on Khan sir and Guru Rahman to see how they respond to the allegations. The controversy has undoubtedly put a spotlight on the functioning of BPSC and its examination processes. While the commission remains firm in its stance, the educators’ refusal to apologize could lead to prolonged legal battles, further impacting public perception and trust.
This issue serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability in public examinations and the responsibilities of educators in shaping public discourse.